Archive

Archive for the ‘Media Technology’ Category

Facebookers Freak Over Terms of Use

February 19th, 2009

This is a message for people who are concerned with their privacy after uploading pictures to Facebook:

Stop using the Internet. It is just simply not for you.  Don’t use email anymore, because any message you send is stored on your ISP’s server, the destination server, probably on a backup or two in some data center somewhere.  The message itself is readable by sinister criminals looking to steal your identity.  If you created a profile on Facebook with all your personal details, and pictures of your dog, and whatever, then your expectation of privacy is non-existent.

For those of you that are concerned that Evil Facebook is claiming to own your pictures of your dog, and your deep, dark secret status updates:

Get over yourself. Your pictures and videos are worthless, and even if Facebook had claimed sole ownership of it (which they never did), what do you think they will do with it?  Sell t-shirts with your picture on it, or sell DVDs of your birthday party, and not cut you in for at least a few points on the back end?  Understand what is Facebook’s potential business model: your participatory information.  That is, they want to know what you are doing, where you are doing it and when you are doing it.  This is the raison d’etre for Facebook Connect.  They just announced that they will sell crowd-sourced market research data to corporations.  They need you to participate.  For this to work, certain information needs to stick around, and they want to keep it.  This explicitly does not include anything you marked “private”.  If you have marked stuff private, see my first point.

If you don’t like it, close your account. Facebook is a FREE service that allows you communicate with your friends, share pictures and videos, and all kinds of other fun and useful stuff.  Close your account and go to MySpace or Linked In (who’s terms read like a non-exclusive content licensing deal, potentially in perpetuity).  Don’t enter ANY user-generated content site, who will universally claim the sole ownership of your goofy video, and WILL re-purpose it in every conceivable way.

I like Facebook.  I don’t think they are evil.  I think they have a cool product, and they can’t seem to make any money.  If I can passively provide data to help them make a buck, then all the power to them.

Just don’t represent me to my friends that I endorse schlock.

Media Technology, Social Media ,

Facebook Connect for Publishers

February 10th, 2009

Why should all publishers be looking at Facebook Connect?

There are a number of websites to find examples of the cool stuff you can do by implementing Facebook Connect (FBC) into your product. Razorfish’s Jesse Pickard posted an article for insidefacebook.com that outlined a number of interesting connected applications, AllFacebook.com has a list of the “top” Facebook Connect enabled sites, and The Facebook Developer wiki aspires to maintain an exhaustive list of connected sites.  If you are a PowerPoint freak, here is a slideshow created by social media marketing agency bigMETHOD, laying down the FBC basics.

The Facebook Connect homepage lays out the key benefits:

Enable your users to…

* Seamlessly “connect” their Facebook account and information with your site
* Connect and find their friends who also use your site
* Share information and actions on your site with their friends on Facebook

Beyond that, they also claim:

“early results have shown that sites using Facebook Connect for login have seen as many as 2 out of 3 new registrations come via Facebook Connect, and those users have about 50% more engagement on sites.”

The enthusiasm for FBC and excitement about its potential is significant.

However, our clients (large media companies and brands) have been hesitant to adopt, or even experiment with FBC because of some early assumptions relating primarily to user data access.

I would like to try to address some of the questions I have been asked by these clients about Facebook Connect.

What user data do I get from Facebook?

What data can I keep?

What can I store in my CRM?

Will my community be limited to Facebook users?

Read more…

Media Technology, Online Advertising, Social Media , , , , ,

All Eyes Should be on Trent Reznor

January 9th, 2009

Nine Inch Nails just release their new album The Slip as a %100 free download.

I might go so far as to say it is a %110 free download, given the extremely open set of formats it which it is available:

  • High-quality MP3s (87 mb) – encoded with LAME at V0, fully tagged.
  • FLAC lossless (259 mb) – CD quality
  • FLAC high definition 24/96 (942 mb) – better-than-CD-quality 24bit 96kHZ audio
  • M4A apple lossless (263 mb) – CD quality – will play in itunes.
  • High definition WAVE 24/96 (1.5 gb) – better-than-CD-quality 24bit 96kHz audio

To add to the modernity of this release, all the the bigger packages are distributed via torrents. Therefore, they only pay to transfer a tiny file from their servers. That’s hella-smart.

There is also the option to order the super-deluxe, collectors CD/DVD and vinyl editions. Now THAT is value.

Trent Reznor is the One-Man-Show (in the studio, at least) behind NIN and has consistently driven the crest of the wave for the music industry. They have released their last several albums as free downloads, and for the Year Zero publicity, placed easter eggs URLs around the Internet, each with clues about the album. Fans were encouraged to compile the whole story in the NIN wiki.

They have also made some of their singles available as Garageband projects and full 24/96 Pro-tools sessions for fans to remix. Being a pro-audio geek, that is insanely cool. Check out the remix of “Only” that I built with Pro Tools.

What about video you ask? What about UGC? What about mobile? How about the new fan content gallery, the iPhone game, and 400GB of HD concert footage to play with.

Perhaps they could use an online Mashup Tool for that?

Digital Music, Media Technology , , , , , , , ,

Blackberry, Viigo and Twitter

January 9th, 2009

As some of you know, I am an admitted Blackberry addict. It wasn’t too bad until I got the Bold 9000. This is the next best thing to a laptop, and in my opinion, kills the iPhone if you like to type. The downside is have to talk with a toaster up against you face, but that the price of admission (oh, and $250 bucks).

Then I installed Viigo, and TwitterBerry and my BB really turned into the “adult soother”. If you haven’t tried Viigo for your mobile phone, then stop reading this and install it. Viigo must be an excellent company because they beat my company, Filemobile for the honour of the Canadian New Media Awards Most Promising Company of the Year, for which we and B5 Media were also nominated. Congratulations, by the way!

I very frequently, after reading an article, like to send it to potentially interested parties. Since email is so 1900’s, I prefer to tweet my URLs. I can’t do this directly, and have to go through some ass-pain to get the URL (especially the Google reader feeds), copy it, and paste it into my Twitterberry. In fact, it completely discourages the action.

So I sent a feature request to Viigo via their feedback function in the app to allow me to send articles to Twitterberry in the same way as native BB apps do. I got a friendly, “Thanks for your feedback!” email. I then tweeted the fact that I made a feature request. I got a response from Matt Bogart via Twitter:

Ability to use #Viigo as your mobile Twitter app is close at hand. Send articles, updates, replies and more directly!

For those of us who read a lot of articles, and like to tweet URLs, this will be extremely cool!

I am now following Matt, and plan to have that upgrade installed as soon as its available. Hopefully, their Ops team will have there servers ready for the load….

Media Technology, Social Media , , , , ,

UGC Contest Value Propositions

January 3rd, 2009

In the process of media sales, there comes a time when the deal needs to be sweetened, and some sizzle is required to excite an otherwise conservative brand into aligning with a broadcast product. An example of a deal might be a TV spot against a weekly seasonal show that appeals to the brand’s target demographic. Value adds can include becoming the show sponsor or even having the dashing host heartily endorse your event or product.

When that just isn’t enough, it has become increasingly common to “throw in” a UGC contest. It provides further tie-in to the show via the existing web presence, is low-cost and if you know your Web 2.0 lingo, can get a client’s curiosity, interest and even excitement.

I think it is worth looking at some of the ways to value a UGC contest. This is a contest wherein you must upload content in order to be considered for a prize. Winners can be determined in a number of ways including public opinion, judging or random draw. There a number of issues to consider when defining rules, but this outside the scope of this post.

In order to measure the value of a contest, it is important to note what you can expect a contest to produce. Three key products of a UGC contest are demographic data, ad inventory and content. There is also the less quantifiable “positive brand affinity”, but if it can’t be easily measured, it’s little more than a sales talking point.

Demographic data

Who is engaging with my brand, where are they, and will they let me spam them? This is by far the most common brute-force method of generating a tangible, actionable product via a contest. It can also be one of the more obnoxious aspects of participating in a contest. It’s important that there is a balance between getting the data, and minimizing bounces (people immediately leaving the site).

The number of completed entries in your database is proportional to the value of the prize. With this in mind, you don’t need anything except an entry form and a prize information page. Think of it this way: you are offering them a chance to win something in exchange for their personal information. Users are savvy enough these days to know that their data is valuable, and a toaster is not enough to get them to give it up.

Don’t ask for information you don’t need. For example, if you aren’t sending a mailer, do you still need their street address? Most contest systems require the user to enter at least an email address. If want them to opt in to your newsletter, give them a good idea of what the newsletter contains. Make it even more worthwhile by offering coupons for your product via email.

Ad Inventory

For a publisher, the motivation for a self-sponsored contest is primarily to drive subscriptions for electronic newsletters or build awareness of another product (such as CTV’s fall launch campaign). That doesn’t mean you can’t add the page views and video pre-roll to your existing inventory.

Where this makes the most sense is with a sponsored contest. A fully branded microsite within the publisher’s brand site benefits from a built in audience. Any publisher will have excellent statistics describing their core audience demographic.

So how can a UGC contest be in a unique position to drive impressions through social media? If the contest has a voting aspect, users will be compelled to share their video with peers on their social networks via social bookmarking and posting tools on the contest site. Making Facebook Connect available to users allows some social activities (such as uploading and commenting) to automatically be broadcast to their friends. This places a tidy brand message in Facebook, and potentially brings users’ friends back to the contest site.

With some creativity and some Flash razzle-dazzle, you could build a branded widget that allows users to feature their content on any social network, with branding, and interaction built in. Remember how people use these networks, though: on Facebook, I put my content there to be consumed by my friends, not by me.

A good way to have people share content is to tie it with voting. Give people the tools to campaign for their entry.

Content

Although user-generated is generally synonymous with “bad”, it is the needles in the haystack, the diamonds in the rough and that tasty sausage in a sea of turds that can make the campaign memorable, if even only for that fleeting 15 minutes.

In order to get usable content, make the task simple and specific. Seed content with a variety of interpretations of the simple task. Nobody wants to be first, and most people will take a lead and go with it. Focus your concept on video, because it is more engaging and you can sell pre-roll against it.

It’s not uncommon for firms to spend tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousand of dollars on a 30 second TV spot. You only need to focus your strategy on gathering 1-2 minutes of footage to cut together a decent spot.

These are a few observations have come up with many of the UGC contests I have worked on. If you have some examples of good UGC contest concepts, let us know in the comments.

Media Technology, Online Advertising, Social Media , , , , , ,